Abstract

In a rapidly changing world we need methods to efficiently assess biodiversity in order to monitor ecosystem trends. Ecological monitoring often uses plant community composition to infer quality of sites but conventional aboveground surveys only capture a snapshot of the actively growing plant diversity. Environmental DNA (eDNA) extracted from soil samples, however, can include taxa represented by both active and dormant tissues, seeds, pollen, and detritus. Analysis of this eDNA through DNA metabarcoding provides a more comprehensive view of plant diversity at a site from a single assessment but it is not clear which DNA markers are best used to capture this diversity. Sequence recovery, annotation, and sequence resolution among taxa were evaluated for four established DNA markers (matK, rbcL, ITS2, and the trnL P6 loop) in silico using database sequences and in situ using high throughput sequencing of 35 soil samples from a remote boreal wetland. Overall, ITS2 and rbcL are recommended for DNA metabarcoding of vascular plants from eDNA when not using customized or geographically restricted reference databases. We describe a new framework for evaluating DNA metabarcodes and, contrary to existing assumptions, we found that full length DNA barcode regions could outperform shorter markers for surveying plant diversity from soil samples. By using current DNA barcoding markers rbcL and ITS2 for plant metabarcoding, we can take advantage of existing resources such as the growing DNA barcode database. Our work establishes the value of standard DNA barcodes for soil plant eDNA analysis in ecological investigations and biomonitoring programs and supports the collaborative development of DNA barcoding and metabarcoding.

Highlights

  • Monitoring changes in biodiversity at a site over time–“biomonitoring”–is key for understanding ecosystem status [1,2]

  • Environmental DNA extracted from samples of soil or water is subjected to high throughput sequencing (HTS) and sequences are compared to reference libraries to identify the biodiversity at a given site

  • ITS2 had the greatest coverage on GenBank of the four DNA markers in terms of total number of vascular plant species present and ratio of sequences to species

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Monitoring changes in biodiversity at a site over time–“biomonitoring”–is key for understanding ecosystem status [1,2]. Metabarcoding Plant Biodiversity from Soil programs, aboveground morphological surveys only capture a snapshot of existing plant growth and may fail to observe any species missing diagnostic characters such as flowers [3] as well as ephemeral, cryptic or dormant plants [4]. Molecular methods such as DNA barcoding—specimen identification by sequencing a standardized genomic region and comparing it against a reference database—are increasingly being used [5] but still require collection and separation of individual specimens [6], and are unsuitable for surveys of belowground plant diversity [7]. Can plant DNA metabarcoding provide new insights for biomonitoring but it has already led to novel avenues for forensic soil analysis [13] and enriched our understanding of animal diets [14,15]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call