Large scale adverse event data mining for targeted therapies development.

Abstract

2538 Background: Targeted anti-cancer small molecule drugs & immune therapies have had a dramatic impact in improving outcomes & the approach to clinical trials. Increasingly, regulatory approvals are expedited with small studies designed to identify strong efficacy signals. However, this may limit the extent of safety profiling. The use of large scale/big data meta-analyses can identify novel safety & efficacy signals in "real-world" medical settings. Methods: We used AERSMine, an open-source data mining platform to identify drug toxicity signatures in the FDA’s Adverse Event Reporting System of 8.6 million patients. We identified patients (n = 732,198) who received either traditional and targeted cancer therapy & identified therapy-specific toxicity patterns. Patients were classified based on exposures: anthracyclines (n = 83,179), platinum (117,993), antimetabolites (93,062), alkylators (81,507), antimicrotubule agents (97,726), HER2 inhibitors (40,040), VEGFis (79,144), VEGF-TKis (90,734), multi TKis (34,457), anaplastic lymphoma Kis (7,635), PI3K-AKT-mTOR inhibitors (33,864), Bruton TKis (9,247), MEKis (4,018), immunomodulatory agents (174,810), proteasome inhibitors (44,681), immune checkpoint inhibitors (20,287). Pharmacovigilance metrics [Relative Risks & safety signals] were used to establish statistical correlation & toxicity signatures were differentiated using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Results: To validate the use of the AERSMine to detect AEs, we focused on cardiotoxicity. It identified classic drug associated AEs (e.g. ventricular dysfunction with anthracyclines, HER2is & VEGFis; VEGFi hypertension & vascular toxicity; multi TKIs vascular events). AERSMine also identified recently reported uncommon toxicities of myositis/myocarditis with immune checkpoint inhibitors. It indicated a higher frequency of myositis/myocarditis with combination immune checkpoint therapy, paralleling industry corporate safety databases. These toxicities were reported at higher frequencies in patients > 65 yrs. Conclusions: AERSMine “big data” analyses provide a sensitive tool to detect potential new patterns of AEs simultaneously across multiple clinical trials & in the real-world setting.