Abstract

AbstractAimFollowing the near‐complete destruction of China's forest ecosystems during the 20th century, recent reforestation programmes have created large‐scale mosaics of protected secondary and plantation forests. These restored forests are often assumed to have limited biodiversity conservation value, but large‐scale evaluations of their diversity are lacking. In our study, we compared α‐diversity and species dissimilarity patterns of vascular plants and ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in restored secondary and plantation forests to remnant mature forests across north‐eastern temperate China. We also assessed functional traits of beetles and cross‐taxon diversity links to evaluate differences in ecosystem functioning among forest types.Location. Northeast China.MethodsVascular plant and ground beetle assemblages were recorded in 159 temperate forest plots. The α‐diversity and species compositional dissimilarity of these taxa and the functional traits of beetles were compared between plantation, secondary and mature forest ecosystems.ResultsHerbaceous plant species richness peaked in mature forests, while carabid and woody plant diversity did not differ between forest types. Species dissimilarity of carabids was lowest in mature forests and highest in plantation forests. Mature forest contained the highest proportion of carnivorous beetles and secondary forests of large‐bodied carabids. Carabid diversity and woody plant species richness were positively correlated in mature forests, but not in secondary or plantation forests.Main conclusionsWhile China's mature forests show a great conservation value in harbouring highly diverse herbaceous plant assemblages and an abundance of distinct invertebrate trait groups such as small predatory carabids, China's restored temperate forests also support a high diversity of woody plants and carabids. Overall, our findings offer an encouraging conservation message for biodiversity conservation in China and demonstrate the importance of policy measures that ensure effective long‐term protection of both, China's remnant mature forests, but also its new forest ecosystems.

Highlights

  • Mature forests harbour significant proportions of the global species pool, and their widespread destruction is a key driver of the ongoing global biodiversity crisis (Gibson et al, 2011; Watson et al, 2018)

  • Our findings offer an encouraging conservation message for biodiversity conservation in China and demonstrate the importance of policy measures that ensure effective long‐term protection of both, China's remnant mature forests, and its new forest ecosystems

  • In combination with forest protection policies such as logging bans that apply to all forest ecosystems, these restoration projects have resulted in vast areas of protected forest plantations and naturally regenerated secondary forests (Li, 2004; Viña, McConnell, Yang, Xu, & Liu, 2016)

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Mature forests harbour significant proportions of the global species pool, and their widespread destruction is a key driver of the ongoing global biodiversity crisis (Gibson et al, 2011; Watson et al, 2018). Links be‐ tween plant and invertebrate diversity patterns within forests are not always positive (Axmacher, Liu, Wang, Li, & Yu, 2011; Schuldt et al, 2011; Zou, Sang, Bai, & Axmacher, 2013) This means that policies and measures designed to protect areas of high plant di‐ versity or enhance local plant species richness might have limited value for the conservation of invertebrate assemblages (Schuldt et al, 2015), and for the ecosystem services they provide. Evidence from selected sites in our previous studies suggests that secondary and plantation forests contain a smaller proportion of predatory carabid species than mature forests (Zou, Sang, Wang, et al, 2015) This trend has not previously been tested at a wider geographic scale. We hypothesize that at large spatial scales, there is a positive link between plant species richness and species diversity in carabid assemblages

| MATERIALS AND METHODS
Findings
| DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call