Abstract

Two Ni-based and two Co-based mixed-ligand metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), which are all isoreticular with each other, are shown to have a large variation in nitrogen, carbon dioxide, hydrogen, and water vapor sorption properties, despite their similar structures. The MOFs have 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethane (bpe) as the common ligand with the second ligand being either 2-nitroterephthalate (2-nta) or 2-bromoterephthalate (2-bta) for the Ni-based MOFs or 2-nta or 2-aminoterephthalate (2-ata) for the Co-based MOFs. The four MOFs have the formula [Ni(2-nta)(bpe)(H2O)2]n·2(DMA)n (1), [Ni(2-bta)(bpe)(H2O)2]n·2.8(DMF)n (2), [Co(2-nta)(bpe)(H2O)2]n·2(DMA)n (3), and [Co(2-ata)(bpe)(H2O)2]n·3(DMA)n·(H2O)n (4), respectively, where DMA = N,N′-dimethylacetamide and DMF = N,N′-dimethylformamide. Variable-temperature powder X-ray diffraction (VT-PXRD) studies indicate that the activated MOF structures are different from those of the as-synthesized MOFs, showing that the 2-periodic layers are dynamic upon desolvation. For the same metal ion, the MOF involving the 2-nta ligand has higher sorption, while sorption for the Ni-based MOFs is higher than for the Co-based MOFs. MOF 1 has the highest sorption within the isoreticular series and also has the highest sorption (the highest for water vapor) compared to other MOFs with the same or related ligands.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.