Abstract

The idea of a comprehensive coding system, able to code any concept has allure; similarly linking a term to related concepts. However, there appear to be flaws: firstly just getting these links right and keeping them up-to-date, secondly how you find data in such a comprehensive system? If limited lists have to be imposed to make things usable why not just stick with the limited list? Routine data offers enormous opportunities for quality improvement and research;12 we should avoid putting this at risk until these issues are resolved. Perhaps a head-to-head test of SNOMED CT v. the widely used combination of the International Classification of Disease (ICD)13 and the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC)14,15 is needed to resolve these important issues. Further debate is needed about the pros and cons of SNOMED CT. Are these teething problems or fundamental flaws? © 2011 PHCSG, British Computer Society.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.