Abstract
AIM to assess the efficacy of combination of laparoscopy and protocol of enhanced recovery in patients with colorectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Between 2008-2016 466 patients were randomly allocated into 3 groups. Of them 266 of received perioperative treatment according to enhanced recovery protocol, 191 had routibne open procedure (group 2) and, 75 had laparoscopic operation (group 1). Patients underwent the following procedures: right hemicolectomy (n=53), left hemicolectomy (n=32), sigmoidectomy (n=55), abdomeno-perineal excision (n=67) and low anterior resection of rectum(n=201), other operation - 58. The following variables were analized: operating time, intraoperative blood loss, time of first flatus and defecation, morbidity (wound infections, anastomotic leakage, peritonitis, postoperative ileus, urinary disorders, thrombosis, cardiopulmonary complications). RESULTS. Groups were comparable in gender, comorbidities, body mass index, types of operations. Operating time did not differ significantly between 3 groups. Intraoperative blood loss was higher in conventional group. The time offirstflatus and defecation were better in group 1 and 2. Mortality rate was similar. Morbidity was lower in group 1 and 2 compared with conventional group: wound infections 1,3%, 3,1% vs 9%, anastomotic leakage 4%, 5,5% vs 9%, ileus 1,2 vs 5,4%, peritonitis 2,6%, 1,5% and 3,5%, bowel obstruction caused by the adhesions 0%, 6,8% vs 5,5%. Reoperation rate was 4%, 4,7% vs 5,5%, consequemntly. CONCLUSION. Combination of laparoscopic surgery withenhanced recovery program provides better results of treatment.
Highlights
AIM to assess the efficacy of combination of laparoscopy and protocol of enhanced recovery in patients with colorectal cancer
Between 2008-2016 466 patients were randomly allocated into 3 groups
Of them 266 of received perioperative treatment according to enhanced recovery protocol, 191 had routibne open procedure and, 75 had laparoscopic operation
Summary
Изучить эффективность сочетанного применения лапароскопических технологий и программы оптимизации периоперационного периода. До начала лечения все пациенты были разделены на 3 группы. 200 больных группы сравнения перенесли открытую операцию и получали стандартную периоперационную терапию. В лечении остальных 266 больных, которые вошли в группу 1 и 2, применялась программа оптимизации периоперационного ведения. 75 пациентов группы 1 были прооперированы с использованием видеолапароскопических технологий. Остальные пациенты были оперированы лапаротомным доступом и вошли в группу 2. Продолжительность операций в группах достоверно не отличалась. Восстановление моторной функции кишечника происходило достоверно раньше в первой группе. Количество осложнений было достоверно ниже в первой и второй группах. Сроки достижения готовности к выписке были достоверно ниже в группах 1 и 2. Сочетание программы оптимизации периоперационного ведения с лапароскопическими технологиями повышает эффективность лечения, позволяет ускорить восстановление моторной функции кишечника, сократить количество послеоперационных осложнений.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.