Abstract

BackgroundSurgical resection is the main treatment for pheochromocytoma (PHEO). Although open surgery (OS) has been shown to be safe and feasible, the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery (LS) for PHEO remain controversial due to the uncertain effects of pneumoperitoneum on haemodynamics and the complexity of the tumour itself. This study was performed to compare the treatment outcomes of OS with those of LS for patients with PHEO.MethodsA systematic search through November 11, 2019, was conducted. All studies comparing outcomes of LS and OS for PHEO were included according to eligibility criteria. This meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager Software, version 5.3, and STATA software, version 12.0. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.ResultsFourteen studies involving 626 patients were included in this meta-analysis. LS was associated with lower rates of intraoperative haemodynamic instability (IHD) [odds ratio (OR) = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.37 to 1.00, P = 0.05], less intraoperative blood loss [weighted mean difference (WMD) = − 115.27 ml, 95% confidence interval (CI): − 128.54 to − 101.99, P < 0.00001], lower blood transfusion rates [OR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.21 to 0.52, P < 0.00001], earlier ambulation (WMD = − 1.57 d, 95% CI: − 1.97 to − 1.16, P < 0.00001) and food intake (WMD = − 0.98 d, 95% CI: − 1.36 to − 0.59, P < 0.00001), shorter drainage tube indwelling time (WMD = − 0.51 d, 95% CI: − 0.96 to − 0.07, P = 0.02) and postoperative stay (WMD = − 3.17 d, 95% CI: − 4.76 to − 1.58, P < 0.0001), and lower overall complication rates (OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.88, P = 0.01). However, no significant differences in operative time, postoperative blood pressure control, rates of severe complications, postoperative hypotension or cardiovascular disease (CVD) were found between the two groups.ConclusionsLS is safe and effective for PHEO resection. Compared with OS, LS caused less IHD, providing an equal chance to cure hypertension while also yielding a faster and better postoperative recovery.

Highlights

  • Surgical resection is the main treatment for pheochromocytoma (PHEO)

  • Literature search A systematic search in electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library) was implemented to identify eligible studies comparing laparoscopic surgery (LS) and open surgery (OS) for PHEO published through November 11, 2019

  • The results showed no statistically significant difference in the number of patients whose blood pressure returned to normal after surgery in either the LS group or the OS group (OR = 1.46, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78 to 2.75, P = 0.27, I2 = 38% for heterogeneity, P = 0.19; Fig. 5)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Surgical resection is the main treatment for pheochromocytoma (PHEO). open surgery (OS) has been shown to be safe and feasible, the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery (LS) for PHEO remain controversial due to the uncertain effects of pneumoperitoneum on haemodynamics and the complexity of the tumour itself. An increasing number of studies have suggested that LS is a safe and feasible procedure for PHEO and might become a more optimal approach than OS [6,7,8]. LS was found in many studies to be superior to OS in terms of treatment outcomes Most of these studies involved an insufficient number of enrolled patients and a single institution, rendering the advantages of LS in these studies less convincing. This meta-analysis was conducted to compare treatment outcomes of LS and OS for PHEO based on current retrievable studies. This study complies with PICOS principles [9]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call