Laparoscopic Versus Open Preperitoneal Mesh Repair of Inguinal Hernia: an Integrated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Published Randomized Controlled Trials.

Abstract

The objective of this article is to systematically analyse the randomized, controlled trials comparing open (OPPR) versus laparoscopic (LPPR) preperitoneal mesh repair of inguinal hernia. Randomized, controlled trials comparing OPPR versus LPPR of inguinal hernia were analysed systematically using RevMan®, and combined outcomes were expressed as odds ratio (OR) and standardized mean difference (SMD). Ten randomized trials evaluating 1286 patients were retrieved from the electronic databases. There were 606 patients in the OPPR repair group and 680 patients in the LPPR group. There was significant heterogeneity among trials (p < 0.0001). Therefore, in the random effects model, LPPR was associated with longer operative time and relatively lesser postoperative pain in the case of the trans-abdominal preperitoneal approach. Statistically, both OPPR and LPPR were equivalent in terms of developing chronic groin pain, recurrence and postoperative complications. OPPR of inguinal hernia is associated with shorter operative time and comparable with LPPR (both total extraperitoneal and trans-abdominal preperitoneal approaches) in terms of risk of chronic groin pain, recurrence and complications.