Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy outcomes across a low-and middle-income country metropolitan health service.

Abstract

Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy (LSC) is a safe alternative for difficult cholecystectomies to prevent bile duct injury and open conversion. The primary aim was to detail the use and outcomes on LSCs. Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Relative clinical factors, outcomes, and 30-day follow-up between LSC and LC were compared using univariate and multivariate analyses. Six hundred and twenty four cholecystectomies were performed and 53 (8.5%) required LSC. 81.8% were fenestrating LSC. Male sex was significantly overrepresented in the LSC group (p<0.01) and patients requiring LSC were significantly older (p<0.01). Same admission cholecystectomy was associated with a higher risk of LSC (p<0.01). Patients with a history of previous surgery, preoperative ERCP, or percutaneous cholecystostomy had an increased risk of undergoing LSC (p<0.01). A necrotic gallbladder was the most significant predictor of the need for a LSC (p<0.001). A contracted gallbladder, extensive adhesions, gallbladder empyema, and severe inflammation were significant predictors of difficulty (all p<0.01). Postoperative complications occurred in 26.4% of LSC patients. There were ten (18.9%) Clavien-Dindo Grade III complications, 5.7% required ERCPs, and 9.4% required relook laparotomies. Significantly, more patients in the LSC group developed bile leaks (n=8, 15%) (p<0.001). There were two readmissions within 30days, one mortality, and no BDIs occurred in the LSC cohort. LSC provides a feasible surgical option that should be utilized in complex cholecystitis.