Abstract

BackgroundWe aimed to explore the causal analysis, clinical characteristics and treatment strategies of laparoscopic conversion to open approach (LCTOA) in radical nephrectomy and tumor thrombectomy.MethodsWe included all patients with Mayo level I–III renal tumors with inferior vena cava (IVC) tumor thrombus who underwent laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and tumor thrombectomy as the first choice from May 2015 to July 2019.ResultsThere were 70 cases of renal tumor with IVC tumor thrombus treated with a laparoscopic approach as the first choice; 31 Mayo level I, 30 Mayo level II, and 9 Mayo level III. A completely laparoscopic approach was performed in 51 cases (72.9%), and 19 cases (27.1%) underwent active or passive LCTOA. The LCTOA group had higher median preoperative serum creatinine (110.0 μmol/L vs 92.0 μmol/L; P = 0.026), longer postoperative hospital stay (9 days vs 7 days; P = 0.008), longer median operation time (374 min vs 311 min; P = 0.017), higher median intraoperative hemorrhage volume (1300 vs 600 ml; P = 0.020), and higher proportion of male patients (94.7% vs 66.7%; P = 0.016) vs the completely laparoscopic group, respectively. Although preoperative serum creatinine and gender were risk factors in the univariate analysis, multivariate analysis revealed no independent risk factors for LCTOA. We divided the reasons for LCTOA into active conversion and passive conversion; 4 (21.1%) cases underwent active conversion, and 15 (78.9%) underwent passive conversion. Most of the patients undergoing passive conversion had multiple concurrent risk factors, among which perirenal adhesion (30.9%), organ invasion (16.4%), and IVC adhesion (25.5%) were the most common. Fourteen (73.7%) cases underwent renal treatment, and 5 (26.3%) cases underwent tumor thrombus treatment.ConclusionsThe LCTOA group had a higher median preoperative serum creatinine concentration, longer hospital stay, longer median operation time, and higher median intraoperative hemorrhage volume. However, none of the predictors in our study was an independent risk factor for LCTOA. Perirenal adhesion, organ invasion, and IVC adhesion were the most common causes of LCTOA. Considering the limitations of this study, studies with large sample sizes are required to validate our conclusions.

Highlights

  • We aimed to explore the causal analysis, clinical characteristics and treatment strategies of laparoscopic conversion to open approach (LCTOA) in radical nephrectomy and tumor thrombectomy

  • The inclusion criteria were: 1) preoperative enhanced CT and/or enhanced MRI and other imaging findings showing a renal malignant tumor and inferior vena cava (IVC) tumor thrombus; 2) tumor thrombus classed as Mayo level I–III; 3) laparoscopic Radical nephrectomy and tumor thrombectomy (RNATT) was the first choice; and 4) renal malignant tumor confirmed as renal cell carcinoma on postoperative pathology

  • We divided the reasons for LCTOA into active conversion and passive conversion

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We aimed to explore the causal analysis, clinical characteristics and treatment strategies of laparoscopic conversion to open approach (LCTOA) in radical nephrectomy and tumor thrombectomy. Radical nephrectomy and tumor thrombectomy (RNATT) is a traditional and effective treatment and can effectively improve the prognosis, with a 5-year cancer specific survival rate of 40–65% [4]. In 1996, McDougall et al [6] reported the first case of completely laparoscopic surgery for renal cancer with Mayo level I tumor thrombus. In 2006, Romero et al [7] reported the first case of completely laparoscopic surgery for renal cancer with Mayo level II tumor thrombus. Laparoscopic surgery is a minimally invasive treatment with similar therapeutic effect to open surgery, but requires more involved operative technique and clinical experience. The pursuit of minimally invasive treatment should not be at the expense of therapeutic effect; and, if necessary, the minimally invasive approach should be converted to open surgery at an appropriate time

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call