Abstract
Biliary tract injury represents the most serious and potentially life-threatening cholecystectomy complication. It is important to identify thestructure of Calot�s triangle during isolation of cystic duct to decrease this injury. Cystic duct isolation is the first dangerous techniquein laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Retrograde (fundus first) dissection is frequently used in open cholecystectomy and although feasiblein laparoscopic cholecystectomy, it has not been widely practiced as the antegrade conventional one. This article is presented to showthat retrograde method appears to be a safe procedure and does not compromise the conventional one. It should be tried if obscureanatomy should occur without proceeding to irreparable hemorrhage or biliary injury. If these do occur, conversion is always a viablechoice and should not be deemed a failure. However, retrograde dissection remains to have its error trap that is mostly leading tovasculobiliary injuries as well as the drawback of retained GB stones tendency.Abbreviations: OC: Open cholecystectomy, LC: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, RLC: Retrograde laparoscopic cholecystectomy,CLC: Conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy, GB: Gallbladder, CBD: Common bile duct, CHD: Common hepatic duct, IOC:Intraoperative cholangiography, ERCP: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.