Laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair: Patient reported outcomes in the elderly from a single centre - A prospective cohort study.

Abstract

BackgroundWith those over 65 making up over 16% of the UK's population, surgeons are counselling increasing numbers of elderly patients for hernia repair. Data is currently lacking comparing different repair methods of inguinal hernias in the elderly population with regards to patient reported outcomes.AimTo compare open and laparoscopic hernia repair in patients >65 years old and those <65 years old with respect to patient reported outcomes.MethodAs part of a quality assurance process patients receive a telephone consultation day 2 post procedure. This includes an optional survey with questions to quantify pain, general feeling, nausea, dizziness, drowsiness, satisfaction and vomiting since the operation. Patients were then classified into age ≥ 65 years or <65 years and subclassified into totally extraperitoneal (TEP) or open inguinal hernia repair (IHR).ResultsData is presented from patients treated between January 2009 and August 2016, totalling those included 1167 of 2522 (55.5%). Only five patients (4.42%) reported moderate pain; in the >65 TEP group this was significantly lower (10.2% open IHR <65; 6.7% TEP <65; 12.8% open IHR >65). Patient satisfaction with the surgery was satisfied or very satisfied in all patients in all groups.ConclusionTime off work is not an absolute appropriate measure of return to premorbid status with respect to the elderly as a substantial number of >65 year olds have retired. We therefore present this interesting insight into patient perceptions following hernia repair by age group. Overall patients over 65 can expect the same high levels of satisfaction and low levels of pain following either technique for inguinal hernia repair as younger patients.