Language preferences of youth with visual impairments

Abstract

Both identity-first and person-first language can be appropriate when writing about disability. Identity-first language (IFL) places the disability identifier first in the syntax of the sentence (visually impaired athlete), while person-first language (PFL) places the descriptor of the person before the descriptor of the disability (athlete with a visual impairment). The extent to which individuals with disabilities identify with a disability culture is affected by the development of their own identity in relation to their disability, and may impact language choices. Furthermore, the stage with which an individual is at concerning their disability identity development could impact their decision on PFL versus IFL. Whether the disability is congenital or acquired and whether the condition is temporary, permanent, or progressive are additional considerations impacting identity formation and language preferences. Current tensions exist regarding the use of IFL versus PFL, particularly between practitioners and disabled individuals.