Abstract

This article addresses the question of the effectiveness and the fairness of the language policy of the European Union, by carrying out a comparative analysis of four alternative language regimes. A monolingual language policy based on English only, a trilingual language regime founded on English, French and German, and finally an oligarchic language policy including six official languages are compared to the status quo, that is, a multilingual language regime based on the formal equality among the official languages of the EU Member States. Using statistical analysis and data provided by Eurostat, this article shows that multilingualism is (and will be for the foreseeable future) by far the most effective language policy for the external communication of the EU. Further, results reveal that a drastic reduction in the number of official and working languages of the EU would have regressive effects among EU citizens, as it would be significantly detrimental to Europeans with a low level of education and income, and to the elderly. The empirical evidence provided in this article supports the claim that a multilingual language policy can contribute to the social cohesion in the EU.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.