Abstract

ABSTRACT Despite the commonly acknowledged role of language in the successful settlement of refugees, a more thorough understanding is required of how linguistic inequalities may impact on settlement, social inclusion and social cohesion. This article presents findings from a qualitative study on refugee settlement in New Zealand, a country with a strategic focus on improving social cohesion outcomes. The article takes a Bakhtinian dialogical approach and, informed by an ethical perspective of answerability, it conceptualises social cohesion as situated in the interactions that occur between the ‘speaking subject’ and the ‘other’. Viewing social cohesion as intersubjective and enacted in various (linguistic) encounters yet shaped by, and shaping, broader contexts, it argues that social cohesion is significantly impacted by a range of linguistic inequalities, especially in the case of resettled refugees. As dialogical interactions require language and a shared understanding between participants, limited resources in the dominant linguistic code combined with a lack of linguistic and communicative accommodation from the interlocutor impact on the subject’s ability to author themselves and to affect the outcomes of the interaction. This, in turn, has significant implications for settlement outcomes.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.