Abstract
Thomas compares the representation of text as space (and space as text) in the work of Paul Celan and J. H. Prynne. Prynne and Celan share a distinctive spatial vocabulary of hostile landscapes, subterranean spaces and contingent dwellings. In both cases, this is underpinned by some form of scepticism regarding language’s capacity to produce meaning. Drawing on Derrida’s concept of ‘trace’, and the notion of literary space more broadly, this analysis explores the role of archaeology and geology in Prynne and Celan’s work of the 1960s and early 1970s. It reads Celan’s theory of the meridian in the context of this critical discourse of meta-linguistic or meta-textual spaces, suggesting various ways in which both writers conceive of the poem itself as a literary space of intersubjective encounter in difficult terrain.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
