Abstract
The ecosystem services concept has been introduced as a decisive approach to include ecosystem functioning in land-use planning and stakeholder-driven sustainable development. Early integration of stakeholders in participatory processes in the nexus of ecosystem services, climate adaption, and land-use management is still a demanding challenge. This investigation followed a cognitive approach to archetype analysis. We defined cognitive archetypes as recurrent patterns in individual perceptions of social-ecological relations. Our aim was to identify cognitive archetypes based on stakeholders’ perceived relation between land-use elements and ecosystem services as exemplified in a German North Sea coastal region. Land-use elements were spatially explicit and delivered a variety of different ecosystem services. The stakeholders were regional decision makers and experts who represented key societal sectors, i.e., water management, agriculture, nature conservation, regional policy, and tourism. Within a participatory process, these stakeholders individually evaluated a matrix of 19 land-use elements and 18 ecosystem services. In terms of archetype analysis, the stakeholders were considered as different cases, and the evaluation of relationships between land-use elements and ecosystem services built the attributions to identify archetypes. They independently agreed on the relevance of close to one-third of 342 attributions, whereas there was disagreement on approximately two-thirds of the possible attributions. By identifying agreements across different sectors, 2 archetypes in land-use element–ecosystem service attributions were identified. The first archetype built on monofunctional attributions, i.e., one land-use element was relevant for the provision of one ecosystem service. The second archetype described land-use elements attributed to bundles of ecosystem services, indicating multifunctionality of land-use elements. Disagreement can result primarily from sector or individual viewpoints. In the case of disagreements, land-use–ecosystem relationships can reveal archetypical mutually exclusive interests, the third archetype. We found that disagreements were mainly individual and not sector specific. This indicated that individual knowledge on service outputs of multiple land uses differed strongly among the stakeholders, particularly with respect to regulatory services.
Highlights
The ecosystem services concept is an established approach for linking ecosystems to human well-being
Spatial archetypes have to date usually been identified on the basis of statistical geodata (e.g., Václavík et al 2013), we started with a participatory determination of land-use elements and ecosystem services that stakeholders consider in their management practices
Taking regional stakeholders’ perceptions and evaluations into account, we propose deploying cognitive archetypes as attributions of land-use elements and their ecosystem service outputs in the context of land-use management patterns
Summary
The ecosystem services concept is an established approach for linking ecosystems to human well-being. There is increasing interest that this concept should be part of land-use management and spatial planning processes (Fürst et al 2017). The understanding, recognition, and spatial distribution of ecosystem services provided by landscapes are of critical relevance for adaptive land-use management (de Groot et al 2010, Müller et al 2010, Koschke et al 2012, Opdam 2013, Potschin and HainesYoung 2013, Vrebos et al 2015). Early integration and implementation of ecosystem services into ecosystem-based management and planning processes remains a challenge (Daily and Matson 2008, Fish 2011, Müller and Burkhard 2012, Albert et al 2014, Schleyer et al 2015, Fürst et al 2017). Approaches are needed to quantify the relationships between land-use elements and ecosystem services (de Groot et al 2010, Potschin and Haines-Young 2013)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
