Abstract

Soil erosion (SE) provides slide mass sources for landslide formation, and reflects long-term rainfall erosion destruction of landslides. Therefore, it is possible to obtain more reliable landslide susceptibility prediction results by introducing SE as a geology and hydrology-related predisposing factor. The Ningdu County of China is taken as a research area. Firstly, 446 landslides are obtained through government disaster survey reports. Secondly, the SE amount in Ningdu County is calculated and nine other conventional predisposing factors are obtained under both 30 m and 60 m grid resolutions to determine the effects of SE on landslide susceptibility prediction. Thirdly, four types of machine-learning predictors with 30 m and 60 m grid resolutions—C5.0 decision tree (C5.0 DT), logistic regression (LR), multilayer perceptron (MLP) and support vector machine (SVM)—are applied to construct the landslide susceptibility prediction models considering the SE factor as SE-C5.0 DT, SE-LR, SE-MLP and SE-SVM models; C5.0 DT, LR, MLP and SVM models with no SE are also used for comparisons. Finally, the area under receiver operating feature curve is used to verify the prediction accuracy of these models, and the relative importance of all the 10 predisposing factors is ranked. The results indicate that: (1) SE factor plays the most important role in landslide susceptibility prediction among all 10 predisposing factors under both 30 m and 60 m resolutions; (2) the SE-based models have more accurate landslide susceptibility prediction than the single models with no SE factor; (3) all the models with 30 m resolutions have higher landslide susceptibility prediction accuracy than those with 60 m resolutions; and (4) the C5.0 DT and SVM models show higher landslide susceptibility prediction performance than the MLP and LR models.

Highlights

  • Landslides are one of the most common geological disasters worldwide, costing many human lives and incurring economic losses every year [1,2,3,4,5]

  • This study has four main steps (Figure 3): (1) preparation of the model dataset, including the landslide inventory map, the 10 predisposing factors (such as Soil erosion (SE), topography wetness index (TWI), . . . etc.) for SE-based models, and 9 predisposing factors for single models. This model dataset is respectively expressed with 30 m and 60 m grid resolutions; (2) correlation analysis, collinearity diagnosis and relative importance analysis of all predisposing factors; (3) the multilayer perceptron (MLP), logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM) and C5.0 decision tree (DT) models are applied to carry out the Landslide susceptibility prediction (LSP); (4) The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) value is adopted to evaluate the performance of all the SE-based models and single models, and the differences in landslide susceptibility index (LSI) before and after adding the SE factor is verified through the Wilcoxon rank test

  • The MLP and LR models are built in the Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) 24.0 Software, the SVM and C5.0 DT models are built in the SPSS Modeler 18.0 Software

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Landslides are one of the most common geological disasters worldwide, costing many human lives and incurring economic losses every year [1,2,3,4,5]. Landslide susceptibility prediction (LSP) can be defined as the spatial probability of landslide occurrence in a certain prediction unit of the study area, under the non-linear coupling effects of landslide-related basic predisposing factors with no consideration of external inducing factors [7]. Landslide susceptibility maps (LSMs) produced from LSP, one of the main visualization tools of the landslide spatial distribution, are beneficial to local engineering geological surveys and the management of landslide-prone areas [8,9,10,11]. Slide mass sources and long-term rainfall erosion destruction are very important geology- and hydrology-related factors in landslide disasters. To better determine and explore the landslide susceptibility distribution, this study explores the effects of anew predisposing factor related to the slide mass sources and rainfall erosion on landslide occurrence based on the four types of conventional predisposing factors

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call