Abstract

One of the first steps in estimating the potential for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD) initiatives is the proper estimation of the carbon components. There are still considerable uncertainties about carbon stocks in tropical rain forest, coming essentially from poor knowledge of the quantity and spatial distribution of forest biomass at the landscape level.We evaluate the influence of site and topography on forest structure, biomass and carbon stock over a forested landscape in Sumatra. Sixteen sites were selected across a landscape of ca. 1000km2, and within each site, a network of small 0.1ha plots was laid down perpendicular to the major topographical gradient. Structural parameters for trees with diameter bigger or equal to 10cm and major life forms were recorded for each plot. The total sampled area was 70.2ha.The above-ground biomass (AGBM) in the 16 sites ranged from 271±19 to 478±38Mgha−1, with a mean of 361±7Mgha−1. This value is similar to the global ‘tropical wet forest’ estimate of Keith et al. (2009), but 23% higher than the biome default value given in the IPCC (2006) guidelines. Plots on acid tuff were the most distinctive in having fewer and smaller trees, with a resulting low AGBM. The number of stems was low, but the average tree diameter was larger on the nutrient-rich young volcanic andesitic soils. Landscape-scale variability of forest structure and dynamics was considerable. Within sites, there was little variation of mean height or mean diameter of the trees, but significant differences in stem density, basal area and AGBM between land facets. Both topography and geology appeared to affect the dynamics and the biomass of the forest.At the same time, our findings confirm the need for caution in extrapolating data from small plots to larger spatial scales when estimating carbon stocks for a given forest type or a region. Our results for C stock values for Sumatra lowland and hill dipterocarp forests (135–240Mgha−1, with a mean of 180Mgha−1) showed higher variability in C stock values at landscape level than generally reported in the literature. Based on our results, stratified sampling is recommended for biomass and carbon estimation. Within an error range of 6–8% of the AGBM, a minimum area of 4–6ha should be sufficient to estimate biomass with satisfactory accuracy at the landscape scale. Networks of several small plots across landscape are preferable to fewer larger plots, providing that the sampling is representative of the land facets in the area.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call