Abstract

Managing vast federal public lands governed by multiple land use policies creates challenges when demographic data on at-risk species are lacking. The U.S. Bureau of Land Management Cedar City Field Office used this project in the Black Mountains (Utah) to inform vegetation management supporting at-risk greater sage-grouse and Utah prairie dog planning. Ecological systems were mapped from satellite remote sensing imagery and used to model species habitat suitability under two levels of management activity (custodial, preferred) and climate scenarios for historic and two global circulation models. Spatial state-and-transition models of ecological systems were simulated for all six scenarios up to 60 years while coupled with expert-developed habitat suitability indices. All ecological systems are at least moderately departed from reference conditions in 2012, whereas habitat suitability was 50.5% and 48.4% for sage-grouse and prairie dog, respectively. Management actions replaced non-native annual grasslands with perennial grasses, removed conifers, and controlled exotic forbs. The drier climate most affected ecological departure and prairie dog habitat suitability at 30 years only. Different climates influenced spatial patterns of sage-grouse habitat suitability, but nonspatial values were unchanged. Climate impacts on fire, vegetation succession, and restoration explain many results. Front-loading restoration is predicted to benefit under future drier climate.

Highlights

  • Local public land managers face challenges when planning conservation of sensitive, threatened, or endangered species in multiuse lands

  • Public land managers preparing plans to conserve whole multiple-use landscapes may be concerned with the following questions [5]: (1) What is the current condition of vegetation? (2) What is the current condition of the habitat for at-risk species? (3) Is vegetation likely to get worse over time under status quo land management? (4) Will at-risk species habitat decline under custodial land management? (5) What kind of management actions, how much per year, and at what cost will meaningfully improve altered systems and habitat over a period of time? (6) Which actions produce the highest ecological return-on-investment given limited funding?

  • The main impetus of this project was to incorporate habitat suitability as an additional metric of condition into Landscape Conservation Forecasting for two at-risk species managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in southwestern Utah: greater sagegrouse (Centrocercus urophasianus; hereafter, GSG) and the federally threatened Utah prairie dog (Cynomys parvidens; hereafter, UPD)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Local public land managers face challenges when planning conservation of sensitive, threatened, or endangered (hereafter at-risk) species in multiuse lands. The main impetus of this project was to incorporate habitat suitability as an additional metric of condition into Landscape Conservation Forecasting for two at-risk species managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in southwestern Utah: greater sagegrouse (Centrocercus urophasianus; hereafter, GSG) and the federally threatened Utah prairie dog (Cynomys parvidens; hereafter, UPD). Both species lacked local, long-term research to inform traditional demography in this region. Objectives to support the BLM’s management include (a) building spatially explicit habitat suitability indices for GSG and UPD, (b) comparing the information from a nonspatial ecological departure metric to habitat suitability, (c) comparing the effects of additional active versus custodial management on ecological systems and habitat suitability, and (d) determining the amount of compensatory vegetation management required to mitigate habitat degradation under future climate scenarios

Materials and Methods
Study Area
Remote Sensing of Vegetation Layers
State-and-Transition Simulation Modeling
Spatial Modeling
Constraints on Management Actions
Range Shifts
Unified Ecological Departure
Greater Sage-Grouse Habitat Suitability
2.10. Utah Prairie Dog Habitat Suitability
Initial Conditions
Future Conditions with CUSTODIAL MANAGEMENT
Future Conditions with PREFERRED MANAGEMENT
Climate Differences
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call