Abstract

Roads are notable and responsible for the loss of biodiversity and disruption of wildlife habitats connectivity. Wildlife crossing structures (WCS) help wildlife move between habitats by connecting fragmented habitats. Their effectiveness is affected by various factors. Here, to identify methods for improving the effectiveness of wildlife crossing structures, we controlled the effect of intrinsic factors, such as size, that are difficult to improve in an already installed area, and then, evaluated the differences in extrinsic factors using 12 landscape characteristics. Our results show that 18 wildlife crossing structures were selected with propensity-score (PS) matching method. The surrounding landscape characteristics differed between high-effectiveness wildlife crossing structures and low-effectiveness wildlife crossing structures. Particularly, there was a significant difference between the ‘statutory protected area’ and the ‘edge’ index of the morphological spatial pattern analysis among the landscape characteristic variables derived within 1 km2 of wildlife crossing structures. We empirically demonstrate that characteristics around highly effective WCS, statutory protected areas are widely distributed, and the ratio of edge of MSPA is low (within 1 km2). Therefore, an important outcome of our research is the demonstration that management of WCS itself is important, but conservation of surrounding habitats and landscape management plans are also significant.

Highlights

  • Roads have profound effects on biodiversity due to habitat disturbance, mortality, and barrier effects

  • This study shows a significant difference between the ‘statutory protected area’ and the ‘edge’ index of the morphological spatial pattern analysis among the 12 landscape characteristic variables derived within 1 km2 of Wildlife crossing structures (WCS)

  • This study attempted to identify landscape characteristic based on effectiveness of wildlife crossing structures

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Roads have profound effects on biodiversity due to habitat disturbance, mortality, and barrier effects. Wildlife crossing structures (hereinafter WCS) are one of the mitigation measures for the negative impact of roads on biodiversity. WCS connect fragmented habitat patches that are disconnected by roadways to prevent wildlife–vehicle collisions [2], increase the safety of motorists [3], maintain wildlife populations [4], and promote gene flow [5]. The general idea of how well a WCS performs is if animals use it, it must be functional. Measures that promote movement across road barriers enhance population viability and likelihood of recolonization [7,8]. How well a WCS performs is evaluated by the animal use

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call