Abstract

Wetlands are one of the world’s most important ecosystems, playing an important role in regulating climate and protecting the environment. However, human activities have changed the land cover of wetlands, leading to direct destruction of the environment. If wetlands are to be protected, their land cover must be classified and changes to it monitored using remote sensing technology. The random forest (RF) machine learning algorithm, which offers clear advantages (e.g., processing feature data without feature selection and preferable classification result) for high spatial image classification, has been used in many study areas. In this research, to verify the effectiveness of this algorithm for remote sensing image classification of coastal wetlands, two types of spatial resolution images of the Linhong Estuary wetland in Lianyungang—Worldview-2 and Landsat-8 images—were used for land cover classification using the RF method. To demonstrate the preferable classification accuracy of the RF algorithm, the support vector machine (SVM) and k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) methods were also used to classify the same area of land cover for comparison with the results of RF classification. The study results showed that (1) the overall accuracy of the RF method reached 91.86%, higher than the SVM and k-NN methods by 4.68% and 4.72%, respectively, for Worldview-2 images; (2) at the same time, the classification accuracies of RF, SVM, and k-NN were 86.61%, 79.96%, and 77.23%, respectively, for Landsat-8 images; (3) for some land cover types having only a small number of samples, the RF algorithm also achieved better classification results using Worldview-2 and Landsat-8 images, and (4) the addition texture features could improve the classification accuracy of the RF method when using Worldview-2 images. Research indicated that high-resolution remote sensing images are more suitable for small-scale land cover classification image and that the RF algorithm can provide better classification accuracy and is more suitable for coastal wetland classification than the SVM and k-NN algorithms are.

Highlights

  • Wetlands play an important role in every aspect of ecological systems, including by providing habitats for fish and wildlife [1,2], regulating climate, improving water quality [3], sequestering carbon [4], and mitigating flooding [5]

  • Vegetation, backfill land, and salt field were classified by a different combinations of features, and the confusion matrix was identical, indicating that these three types of land cover were clearly characterized by a certain spectrum, index, and geometry features that could lead to highly accurate classification

  • The high-resolution Worldview-2 image was more suitable for the small-scale land cover type classification than the medium-resolution Landsat-8 image

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Wetlands play an important role in every aspect of ecological systems, including by providing habitats for fish and wildlife [1,2], regulating climate, improving water quality [3], sequestering carbon [4], and mitigating flooding [5]. Traditional classification methods include the K-mean, the minimum distance method, the maximum likelihood method, the k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) method, and the like; advanced algorithms include the decision tree, artificial neural network, support vector machine (SVM), and random forest (RF) methods These classification algorithms were applied to various images for land use classification of different surface conditions and types of patterns. The advantage of the RF method is that the algorithm is simple, is easy to implement, requires little calculation time, is suitable for a large number of characteristic parameters, is effective at solving redundancy problems, and exhibits a powerful performance in many practical applications These advantages can make up for the shortcomings of k-NN and SVM while obtaining better classification results [36]. Texture features were used for classification to further improve the classification accuracy

Data and Method
Satellite Data
Training and Verification Data
Accuracy Evaluation
Analysis of Classification Results When Fewer Training Samples are Available
Texture Features’ Influence on Classification Accuracy
Findings
Discussion
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.