Abstract
A comprehensive literature tests the effects of land use regulation on housing supply. Most empirical studies find that regulation increases prices and decreases construction levels. Several papers also find a negative relation between regulation intensity and price elasticity of supply. However, we show the share of land available for development is unrelated to the elasticity of housing supply in the standard urban model. By affecting available land share, regulation raises the level of housing prices and reduces production, but does not change supply elasticity. These results suggest testing for the effects of regulatory or topographical constraints on housing supply should be in levels rather than elasticities.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
