Abstract

Bioenergy is an important and feasible option for mitigating global warming and climate change. However, large-scale land-use change (LUC) to expand bioenergy crops, such as sugarcane, raises concerns about the potential negative environmental and socioeconomic side effects. Such effects are context-specific, and depending on the LUC scenario and management practices, several co-benefits can be attained. We reviewed the literature and discussed how LUC and best management practices affect key components of sustainability (e.g., soil health, soil carbon (C) sequestration, greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) emissions, nutrient cycling, water quality, among others) of sugarcane-derived bioenergy production in Brazil. Sugarcane expansion has occurred predominantly over pasture areas, although converting croplands could be also an environmentally feasible option. The land transition from low-productivity pastures to sugarcane cultivation seems to be a sustainable pathway to increase bioenergy production. This LUC scenario enhances soil health and soil C sequestration over time, although soil compaction, biodiversity loss, and erosion are still challenging. Besides, adopting best management practices, such as conservation tillage, sustainable crop residue management, rational fertilization, and recycling by-products, has been fundamental to ensuring sustainable bioenergy production. Public policies and well-designed legal frameworks and regulations, such as the Forest Code and the RenovaBio legislations in Brazil, are necessary to make bioenergy production compatible with rational land use and protection. Lastly, our analysis provided insights into sugarcane expansion over a small proportion (1%) of pasture areas in Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) and sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries, which may result in a substantial impact on global bioenergy supply. We concluded that sugarcane-derived bioenergy is a sustainable option to tackle climate change while provisioning other key ecosystem services and promoting socioeconomic development.

Highlights

  • This article is an open access articleMost climate change mitigation pathways that limit global warming to 1.5 ◦ C or 2 ◦ C rely on bioenergy production to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and store carbon (C) in the soil [1,2]

  • Sugarcane cultivation in Brazil started in the early XVI century in the northeast coastal region for sugar production, establishing the first agricultural commodity produced in the country

  • 3.4% was sugarcane land under crop rotation during planting renovation. This advance of sugarcane over pastures was reported by Dias et al [26]. They observed that pasture area decreased, while sugarcane expanded in the central-south region, mainly in the central and northern São Paulo state (Figure 2a’), which was responsible for approximately 65% of the total national expansion since 1985 [27]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Most climate change mitigation pathways that limit global warming to 1.5 ◦ C or 2 ◦ C rely on bioenergy production to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and store carbon (C) in the soil [1,2]. The sugarcane area likely will keep increasing in near future, in response to growing domestic and international market demand and support provided by national public policies (e.g., RenovaBio–[10]) and international commitments to achieve the Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC) of the 2015 Paris Agreement [11] It must do so in sustainable ways through both enhanced field and industrial productivity. The production and use of biomass for bioenergy can have co-benefits, adverse side-effects, and risks, including land degradation, water scarcity, food insecurity, GHG emissions, and impinging on sustainable development goals [2,13] These impacts are context-specific and depend on the scale of deployment, previous land use, bioenergy crop, soil health, regional climate, and management practices [2].

Land Use Change for Sugarcane Production in Brazil
Soil C Sequestration in Land-Use Change Scenarios for Sugarcane Expansion
Best Management Practices towards Sustainable Sugarcane-Derived
Conservation Tillage and Crop Rotation
Rational Crop Residue Management
Fertilization Management and GHG Emissions in Sugarcane Fields
Recycling Sugarcane by-Products
Public Policies for Promoting Sustainable Bioenergy Production and
Sugarcane Potential for Bioenergy Production in Latin America and Africa
Findings
Final Remarks and Future Perspectives
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.