Abstract

Despite the excitement around the nexus between land, energy and water resource systems, policies enacted to govern and use these resources are still formulated in isolation, without considering the interdependencies. Using a Ugandan case study, we highlight the impact that one policy change in the energy system will have on other resource systems. We focus on deforestation, long term electricity supply planning, crop production, water consumption, land-use change and climate impacting greenhouse gas (GHG) trajectories. In this study, an open-source integrated modelling framework is used to map the ripple effects of a policy change related to reducing biomass consumption. We find that, despite the reduction in deforestation of woodlands and forests, the GHG emissions in the power sector are expected to increase in between 2040–2050, owing to higher fossil fuel usage. This policy change is also likely to increase the cost of electricity generation, which in turn affects the agricultural land types. There is an unforeseen shift from irrigated to rainfed type land due to higher electricity costs. With this integrated model setup for Uganda, we highlight the need for integrated policy planning that takes into consideration the interlinkages between the resource systems and cross propagation effects.

Highlights

  • The land, energy and water systems provide vital resources which are fundamental to human existence

  • Long term electricity supply planning, crop production, water consumption, land-use change and climate impacting greenhouse gas (GHG) trajectories

  • Uganda is chosen owing to the following reasons. (a) Hydropower contributes to more than 80% of Uganda’s electricity generation needs and is expected to be the mainstay for the foreseeable future; vulnerable to climatic changes [8]. (b) Biomass provides about 80% of the total final energy consumption; highly unsustainable [9]. (c) Less than 1% of the cultivated area is under irrigation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The land, energy and water systems provide vital resources which are fundamental to human existence. The Indian state of Punjab has a food production policy to provide irrigation electricity subsidies for farmers. This has resulted in over-abstraction and depletion of the water table. There are concerns about the resilience of infrastructure in the systems mentioned above to an uncertain future climate [12, 13]. These aspects, collectively, make Uganda an ideal case study to observe the ripple or cross-propagative effects of isolated policy decisions

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call