Laissez Faire: Pro and Con

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessLaissez Faire: Pro and ConFrank H. KnightFrank H. Knight Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Journal of Political Economy Volume 75, Number 6Dec., 1967 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/259359 Views: 73Total views on this site Citations: 31Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1967 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Ross B. Emmett What Can We Learn about Frank Knight’s Economic Theory from the Prefaces to the Reprints of Risk, Uncertainty and Profit ?, (Dec 2021): 55–73.https://doi.org/10.1108/S0743-41542021000039C004Mathieu Ginier-Gillet Les grands magasins de la médecine de Milton Friedman, Médecine & Droit 2020, no.165165 (Dec 2020): 150–152.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meddro.2020.07.002Ross B. Emmett James M. Buchanan and Frank H. Knight on democracy as “government by discussion”, Public Choice 183, no.3-43-4 (May 2020): 303–314.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-020-00815-4Craig Freedman Roads Not Taken: The Coase Conundrum, (May 2020): 477–517.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56815-1_16Milan Zafirovski Collective‐unconscious apologetics of plutocracy and oligarchy: Chicago economics' ideological preferences revealed by the sociology of knowledge, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 49, no.44 (Dec 2019): 499–518.https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12227Milan Zafirovski Economics and Apologetics—The Ideology/Utopia of Laissez-Faire and its Discontents, Journal of Economic Issues 53, no.33 (Aug 2019): 647–676.https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2019.1634455Mark R. Reiff The just price, exploitation, and prescription drugs: why free marketeers should object to profiteering by the pharmaceutical industry, Review of Social Economy 77, no.22 (Feb 2019): 108–142.https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2018.1551561Milan Zafirovski , The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 26, no.55 ( 2019): 827.https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2019.1609056Douglas A. Irwin The Midway and Beyond, History of Political Economy 50, no.44 (Dec 2018): 735–775.https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-7202548Milan Zafirovski Rational Choice Theory or Pretense? The Claims, Equivalences, and Analogies of the “Economic Approach to Human Behavior”, Sociological Spectrum 38, no.33 (Jul 2018): 194–222.https://doi.org/10.1080/02732173.2018.1469446Robert Leeson 1–15: Residual Reverence Towards the Second Estate, (Nov 2018): 91–126.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95219-2_3David Cowan Why Knight Was (Not) a Conservative Prophet, (Jun 2016): 247–269.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-46211-4_10David Cowan Knightian Uncertainty, (Jun 2016): 27–74.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-46211-4_2David Cowan Knight contra mundum, (Jun 2016): 99–127.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-46211-4_4David Cowan Welfare Economics, (Jun 2016): 181–205.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-46211-4_7David Cowan Freedom and Reform, (Jun 2016): 207–223.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-46211-4_8Ben Jackson and Zofia Stemplowska On Frank Knight’s “Freedom as Fact and Criterion”, Ethics 125, no.22 (Jun 2015): 552–554.https://doi.org/10.1086/678375Giuseppe Garofalo Irreducible complexities: from Gödel and Turing to the paradigm of Imperfect Knowledge Economics, Quality & Quantity 48, no.66 (Dec 2013): 3463–3474.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-013-9967-5Peter Boettke, Liya Palagashvili Henry Hazlitt as an Intellectual Middleman of “Orthodox Economics”, History of Political Economy 45, no.suppl_1suppl_1 (Dec 2013): 137–165.https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-2310980Giuseppe Garofalo, Paolo Fetoni The Chicago School after the crisis of the new millennium, Quality & Quantity 47, no.22 (Jul 2011): 677–711.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9539-5Andrew Farrant, Edward McPhail Supporters Are Wrong, Challenge 55, no.55 (Aug 2012): 94–105.https://doi.org/10.2753/0577-5132550505Dalibor Roháč Knight, Habermas and Rawls on freedom, personhood and constitutional choice, The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 19, no.11 (Mar 2010): 23–43.https://doi.org/10.1080/09672560903552611Renée Prendergast Sen and Commons on Markets and Freedom, New Political Economy 16, no.22 (Apr 2011): 207–222.https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2010.500720Bruce E. Kaufman The Theoretical Foundation of Industrial Relations and its Implications for Labor Economics and Human Resource Management, ILR Review 64, no.11 (Oct 2010): 74–108.https://doi.org/10.1177/001979391006400104Aliye Ahu Gülümser, Tüzın Baycan-Levent, Peter Nijkamp Measuring Regional Creative Capacity: A Literature Review for Rural-Specific Approaches, European Planning Studies 18, no.44 (Apr 2010): 545–563.https://doi.org/10.1080/09654311003593614D. Wade Hands Frank Knight and pragmatism, The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 13, no.44 (Dec 2006): 571–605.https://doi.org/10.1080/09672560601025779Renee Prendergast The concept of freedom and its relation to economic development—a critical appreciation of the work of Amartya Sen, Cambridge Journal of Economics 29, no.66 (Nov 2005): 1145–1170.https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bei081D. Wade Hands Frank Knight and Pragmatism, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2005).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.927509Lawrence Wai-Chung Lai Book Review: Hayek’s Challenge: An Intellectual Biography of F.A. Hayek, Planning Theory 3, no.33 (Aug 2016): 276–283.https://doi.org/10.1177/147309520400300312James R. Hackney Law and Neoclassical Economics: Science, Politics, and the Reconfiguration of American Tort Law Theory, Law and History Review 15, no.22 (Oct 2011): 275–322.https://doi.org/10.2307/827653R. A. Gonce F. H. Knight on Capitalism and Freedom, Journal of Economic Issues 26, no.33 (Jan 2016): 813–844.https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1992.11505332