Abstract

As a major constituent in magmatic–hydrothermal ore deposits, cassiterites, with moderate amounts of U and low Pb, can be dated with U–Pb geochronology. The tetragonal lattice structure makes cassiterites capable of incorporating dozens of elements within its crystal lattice (e.g., Fe, Ti, W, Zr, Hf, Ta, Nb, Mn, Sc, V, and Sb). Variations of these elements record information of potential elemental substitution mechanisms and precipitation environments of cassiterites. In this study, we collected cassiterite grains from four different ore styles of the Gejiu tin polymetallic deposit to perform LA–ICP–MS U–Pb dating, multiple element mapping, and in situ trace element analysis on these cassiterites. Systematic U–Pb dating yielded Tera–Wasserburg lower intercepted ages at around 85 Ma, coinciding with zircon U–Pb ages of regional Late Yanshanian granitoids, within their respective analytical uncertainties. Such age coincidence, combined with the spatial association, suggests that tin mineralization may be genetically related to the Late Cretaceous granitic magmatism. Multielemental mapping shows that the distribution of Nb, Ta, and Ti in the cassiterite grains correlates well with the regular oscillatory zoning patterns in cathodoluminescence (CL) images. The relatively high Sb, Fe, W, Ga, and U concentrations control the dark luminescing domains in these cassiterite grains. The systematic variations in chemical compositions suggest that trace elements such as Sc, V, Fe, and Ga incorporate in cassiterites via coupled substitutions of Sc3+ + V5+ ↔ 2 (Sn, Ti)4+, Fe3+ + Ga5+ ↔ 2 (Sn, Ti)4+ and Fe3+ + OH– ↔ Sn4+ + O2– or Fe3+ + H+ ↔ Sn4+. The covariation of redox sensitive elements such as W, U, Fe, and Sb indicates that the ”tin-granite” type of cassiterites were formed under an oxidized state whereas cassiterites from skarn, massive sulfide, and oxidized ore styles were precipitated in a reducing environment.

Highlights

  • K–Ar/40 Ar–39 Ar dating on quartz/cassiterite [20], Pb–Pb dating on sulfide [20], Re–Os dating of molybdenite [21], and U–Pb dating of cassiterite [3,8,10,22]

  • Cassiterite grains from tin-granite and skarn ores are largely free of inclusions with the exception of occasional micrometer-sized inclusions of scheelite and Fe-oxide

  • There is a wide range of views on ages of mineralization in the Gejiu tin polymetallic deposit

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cassiterite (SnO2 ) is the most important ore mineral for tin deposits and has a tetragonal lattice structure similar to that of the rutile group (M4+ O2 ) [1–4]. Because cassiterite is resistant to chemical and physical alteration and weathering, trace elements, such as. Ti, W, Zr, Hf, Ta, Nb, Mn, Sc, V, and Sb in cassiterite could be used to study mineralization processes and precipitation environments of tin mineralization [2–10]. The presence of U and Pb makes it possible to date cassiterite with U–Pb creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/). Cassiterite can be used to investigate mineralization timing, precipitation environment, and mechanisms for magmatic–hydrothermal ore deposits or important tin belts worldwide [3,4,16,17]. Many attempts at dating mineralization timing have been conducted on hydrothermal minerals, including

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call