Abstract

During past years, industry has realized several improvements in techniques and materials—for example, with respect to catheter and connection systems—with the goal of reducing the incidence of peritonitis associated with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). Still, peritonitis represents a major problem in peritoneal dialysis (PD) treatment (1). As a contributor to the patient’s therapy, industry is also always searching for alternative, more biocompatible solutions. The restricted biocompatibility of present CAPD solutions—acidic pH; high glucose concentrations, whether directly or indirectly via formation of glucose degradation products (GDPs); hyperosmolality; and nonphysiological high lactate concentrations—may play a role in the limited use of CAPD as renal replacement therapy. Today, about 50% of PD patients are estimated to drop out over a period of five years for various reasons, including peritonitis and loss of ultrafiltration capacity by the peritoneal membrane (2). This statistic strongly suggests a direct relationship between the repeated and long-term exposure of the peritoneal membrane to conventional PD solutions and the potential functional impairment of peritoneal cell populations. Therefore, to ensure membrane longevity, the protection of the peritoneal membrane is a matter of concern.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.