Abstract

“Medical necessity” — the phrase used by payers to encompass one fact: whether they will or won't pay for treatment. Payers usually select and apply a set of “medical necessity criteria” and use that to determine whether something is reimbursable. Obviously, something experimental or proven not to work or to be harmful shouldn't be reimbursable. Generally accepted standards of care should determine medical necessity, notes a new report from the Legal Action Center (LAC) on the uses — or misuses — of medical necessity in substance use disorder (SUD) treatment. Too often, however, health plans use medical necessity criteria only to restrict care and control costs, especially in SUD treatment.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.