Abstract

In China, termination of pilot employment has raised many arguments revolving around the training repayment. When pilots resign from their jobs or are fired, airlines generally claim compensation for the training cost. Questions arising in lawsuits can generally be divided into several categories: repayment window, repayment amount, statutory exemptions, and unfair discharge. The incoherent interpretation of the Chinese Labour Contract Law and the Pilot Movement Directive has led to controversies in civil proceedings. Furthermore, training repayment by pilots contributes to regulatory concerns about aviation safety, fair competition, the right to quit, and contractual unconscionability. This article addresses to what extent current Chinese law recognizes training repayment by civil pilots. Through the case study of Chinese judicial decisions and the comparative study of practices in the United States and the European Union, this article concludes with discussions on a viable way forward. China, labour protection, civil pilots, training cost, repayment obligation

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.