Abstract

Due to the circumstances of their early lives, young refugees are at risk of experiencing adverse labour market and health outcomes. The post-settlement environment is thought to play a decisive role in determining how this vulnerability plays out. This study compared trends in labour market marginalisation in young refugees and their majority peers during early adulthood in two national contexts, Denmark and Sweden, and explored the mediating role of common mental disorders and secondary school completions. Using registry data, 13,390/45,687 refugees were included in Denmark/Sweden and 1:5 matched to majority peers. Inequalities in labour market marginalisation were investigated during 2012-2015 in each country using linear probability models and mediation analysis. Country trends were standardised to account for differences in observed population characteristics. The risk of marginalisation was 2.1-2.3 times higher among young refugees compared with their majority peers, but the risk decreased with age in Sweden and increased in Denmark for refugees. Birth-cohort differences drove the increase in Denmark, while trends were consistent across birth-cohorts in Sweden. Differences in population characteristics did not contribute to country differences. Common mental disorders did not mediate the inequality in either country, but secondary school completions did (77-85% of associations eliminated). The findings document both the vulnerability of young refugees to labour market marginalisation and the variability in this vulnerability across post-settlement contexts. While the contrast in policy climates in Denmark and Sweden sharpened over time, the risk of marginalisation appeared more similar in younger cohorts, pointing to the importance of factors other than national immigration and integration policies. Institutional efforts to assist young refugees through secondary education are likely to have long-lasting consequences for their socio-economic trajectories.

Highlights

  • The consequences of mental ill-health during the transition to adulthood can be long-lasting, as inequalities that crystallise during the transition to adulthood tend to foreshadow socioeconomic and health disparities that persist and worsen throughout life [1, 2]

  • 13,390/45,687 refugees were included in Denmark/Sweden and 1:5 matched to majority peers

  • The risk of marginalisation was 2.1–2.3 times higher among young refugees compared with their majority peers, but the risk decreased with age in Sweden and increased in Denmark for refugees

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The consequences of mental ill-health during the transition to adulthood can be long-lasting, as inequalities that crystallise during the transition to adulthood tend to foreshadow socioeconomic and health disparities that persist and worsen throughout life [1, 2]. Across refugee groups and host societies, refugee children have generally been found to have elevated levels of mental ill-health, including anxiety, depression and stress-related disorders, as well as high levels of externalising and internalising behaviour [3, 4]. As newcomers, they frequently have to acquire one or several new languages while navigating unfamiliar educational settings, but adverse circumstances during their early lives frequently expose them to stressful and traumatising experiences and protracted periods without access to schooling. This study compared trends in labour market marginalisation in young refugees and their majority peers during early adulthood in two national contexts, Denmark and Sweden, and explored the mediating role of common mental disorders and secondary school completions

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.