Abstract
<p><b>Increases in rainfall-induced landsliding following large earthquake are well documented but the time frames over which this heightened hazard persists in the land scape remains poorly understood. Whilst it is well known that the presence of failed and partially slopes after earthquakes significantly reduces the rainfall thresholds required to activate slope movement, their failure susceptibility during specific storms and how this changes through time remains poorly studied. To improve knowledge in this field requires well documented slope failures following earthquakes and a detailed understanding of their potential failure mechanisms when pore pressures are elevated in the slope. The 2016 Mw 7.8 Kaikōura earthquake provides a unique opportunity to study how rainfall events following the earthquake may impact the timing and mechanisms of landslide reactivation. </b></p><p>This study conducted a suite of specialist triaxial cell experiments, designed to replicate varying rainfall scenarios on remoulded samples collected from two sites where numerous earthquake-induced landslides were recorded in similar Late Cretaceous to Neogene sediments with similar physical properties (the Leader Dam Landslides (LDL) and the Limestone Hill landslide (LHL)). In each experiment rainfall events were simulated using a series of different pore pressure scenarios (increases and decreases in mean effective stress) at representative field stress conditions whilst monitoring material deformation behaviour. </p><p>The results demonstrate that both the deformation behaviour and pore pressure required to generate failure were influenced by the previous changes in pore pressure. Samples subjected to stepped increases in pore pressure were subject to greater pre-failure deformation (dilation) and subsequently failed at lower pore pressures (higher mean effective stress) when compared to samples subjected to linear increases in pore pressure. In addition, increases in the rate of pore pressure also increased the amount of pre-failure deformation allowing failure to occur when pore pressures were lower. In contrast a sample subjected to both increases and decreases in pore pressure underwent pre-failure densification and subsequently required a larger increase in pore pressure to fail. The results demonstrate that landslide reactivation is influenced by a number of factors including the amount and rate of previous changes in pore pressure and the slope drainage history. </p><p>The results provide new insights into why landslide susceptibility may remain elevated for prolonged periods of time (e.g. decades) in the landscape as well as why the rainfall thresholds for site specific failures during storms may be difficult to predict. </p>
Highlights
1.1 Global landslide hazard and an agent of geomorphological changeAs a landscape evolves through time landslides represent one of the most important geomorphological processes in steep settings that contributes to its formation
The results provide new insights into why landslide susceptibility may remain elevated for prolonged periods of time in the landscape as well as why the rainfallthresholds for site specific failures during storms may be difficult to predict
2.3 Diagram demonstrating the effect of pore pressures on soil particles. . . 15 2.4 Conceptual diagram demonstrating the effect of increasing pore pres
Summary
1.1 Global landslide hazard and an agent of geomorphological changeAs a landscape evolves through time landslides represent one of the most important geomorphological processes in steep settings that contributes to its formation. In many environments landsliding is a critical process of hillslope erosion, supplying sediment to channel networks and sedimentary basins and in setting the fundamental structure of the landscape (Densmore & Hovius, 2017) As they are, in many cases, a natural process, their unpredictable nature is a serious hazard resulting in loss of life and damage to infrastructure and property globally. It is widely agreed that rainfall-induced landslides are labelled as one of the most devastating landslide types due to their rapid movement and long runout distances, potentially evolving into end members such as debris flows (Tiranti et al, 2018; Liao et al, 2012; Jakob et al, 2005) It is these factors that, combined with the unpredictable nature, pose a significant hazard to society. Debris flow activity has continued to occur and was still active in eight years later in 2016, causing severe damage to nearby villages and reconstruction sites from the earthquake and past debris flows (Fan et al, 2018)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.