Abstract
Abstract Context.—The Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA) regulations for proficiency testing (PT) include prohibitions against intentional PT sample referral or result communication, and specify sanctions against laboratories that violate these regulations. There has been little published analysis of sanctions against clinical laboratories because of PT violations. Objective.—To examine the application of principal sanctions as reported by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services annually in the Laboratory Registry and to examine relevant aspects of judicial hearings and appeals in these cases. Design.—The Laboratory Registry was examined for all available years (1993–2006) to determine the incidence of application of principal sanctions for PT violations. In addition, the decisions from the US Department of Health and Human Services hearings and appeals were reviewed to better understand the judicial disposition of these cases. Results.—During the 14-year period examined, 78 ...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.