Abstract

The purpose of the Laboratory Response Checklist for Infectious Disease Outbreaks (the Checklist) is to provide public health laboratories and laboratory networks operating at multiple jurisdictional levels with a useful, adaptable tool to help rapidly identify important outbreak response considerations, particularly when investigating a previously unknown infectious disease threat. The Checklist was developed by the National Microbiology Laboratory of Canada in collaboration with provincial/territorial, national and international laboratory experts, including the Canadian Public Health Laboratory Network, and the Global Health Security Action Group Laboratory Network. While the Checklist was initially designed to reflect lessons learned through National Microbiology Laboratory participation in extended national and international outbreak responses (e.g. Zika virus epidemic [2015-2016], Ebola virus epidemic, West Africa [2014-2016]), the importance of optimizing laboratory response coordination has only been underscored by the ongoing challenges presented by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic response requirements. The Checklist identifies five highly interdependent laboratory response themes, each of which encompasses multiple considerations that may be critical to a coordinated, strategic outbreak response. As such, the comprehensive review of Checklist considerations by responding laboratory organizations may provide a valuable opportunity to quickly detect key response considerations and interdependencies, and mitigate risks with the potential to impact public health action.

Highlights

  • Infectious disease outbreak response poses unique challenges and considerations for laboratories, when investigating a previously unknown or newly defined infectious disease [1]

  • The potential usefulness of a checklist approach to strengthen laboratory preparedness and response coordination was most recently emphasized by extended National Microbiology Laboratory (NML) engagement in national and international response efforts, in particular the Ebola virus epidemic in West Africa (2014–2016) and the Zika virus epidemic (2015–2016) [5,6,7,8]

  • Development of a checklist tool was considered in alignment with desired outcomes articulated in the Canadian Public Health Laboratory Network Strategic Plan, 2016–2020; including “Priority 2: Strengthen coordinated response capacity to address established, emerging and re-emerging infectious disease pathogens and public health threats” [9]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Infectious disease outbreak response poses unique challenges and considerations for laboratories, when investigating a previously unknown or newly defined infectious disease [1]. Through extensive National Microbiology Laboratory (NML) participation in national and international outbreak and pandemic responses, a number of key considerations and lessons learned have been highlighted These include the potential need for responding laboratories to 1) rapidly develop and deploy novel pathogen-specific diagnostic testing methods, 2) participate in collaborative, iterative development of case definitions and testing criteria to reflect evolving scientific evidence as an outbreak progresses, 3) strategically engage public health partners to optimize response capacity and coordination, and 4) establish information sharing processes and procedures that support timely public health laboratory (PHL) investigation, surveillance, research, public health messaging and action [2]. The Checklist is envisioned as a complementary tool to existing laboratory preparedness and response plans and protocols

Methods
Laboratory investigation
Laboratory response capacity and training
Laboratory surveillance and data management
Interjurisdictional engagement and communication
Research and ethics
Discussion
Method development
Limitations
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call