Abstract
The effectiveness of using alternative environmentally friendly and cost-effective mineral powders to manufacture micro-surfacing treatments is examined. Four mineral powders (calcium carbonate, dolomite, PAVAL, and mineral dust from the recycling of used toner) as well as Portland cement (control) were used. The use of two of them, the PAVAL and the toner, is the main novelty of the present research. Their granulometry by means of an air jet sieve, their density, and their chemical composition by means of X-ray fluorescence (XRF) were obtained. To generalise the findings, two different types of aggregate (siliceous and porphyritic) have been used to manufacture the micro-surfacing treatment. The mixing time, setting and curing characteristics, and workability were analyzed. Additionally, the resistance to the loss of particles by the wet track abrasion was also studied. Likewise, the consistency assessment was done. Finally, the cohesion also was attained. The micro-surfacing treatments manufactured with all the alternative mineral powders comply with the technical requirements. Moreover, they improve the loss of particles, particularly the toner, with a loss of particles between 87% and 280% lower than the control micro-surfacing. Also, they are less hardening-controlling additive demanding. Particularly the PAVAL needs 0.2% of additive while the control micro-surfacing needs 0.6%. These findings are supported by statistical analysis of variance (ANOVA).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have