Abstract
It is known that laboratory investigations secure safe and reliable results that provide a final confirmation of the quality of work. Ideas, planning, knowledge, skills, experience, and environment, along with good laboratory practice, quality control and reliability of quality, make the area of biological investigations very complex. In recent years, quality control, including the control of work in the laboratory, is based on international standards and is used at that level. The implementation of widely recognized international standards, such as the International Standard ISO/IEC 17025 (1) and the implementing of the quality system series ISO/IEC 9000 (2) have become the imperative on the grounds of which laboratories have a formal, visible and corresponding system of quality. The diagnostic methods that are used must constantly yield results which identify the animal as positive or negative, and the precise status of the animal is determined with a predefined degree of statistical significance. Methods applied on a selected population reduce the risk of obtaining falsely positive or falsely negative results. A condition for this are well conceived and documented methods, with the application of the corresponding reagents, and work with professional and skilled staff. This process requires also a consistent implementation of the most rigorous experimental plans, epidemiological and statistical data and estimations, with constant monitoring of the validity of the applied methods. Such an approach is necessary in order to cut down the number of misconceptions and accidental mistakes, for a referent population of animals on which the validity of a method is tested. Once a valid method is included in daily routine investigations, it is necessary to apply constant monitoring for the purpose of internal quality control, in order adequately to evaluate its reproducibility and reliability. Consequently, it is necessary at least twice yearly to conduct comparative inter-laboratory investigations of the reproducibility of the used methods. Having in mind the above presented facts, it can be concluded that good laboratory practice, as well as the implementation of a complete program for security quality, will in the near future become necessary for all laboratories which are interested in acquiring national and international certificates.
Highlights
Vet. glasnik 59 (1 - 2) 71 - 78 (2005) Ruica A{anin i sar: Validacija laboratorijskih dijagnosti~kih metoda u sistemu kvaliteta pouzdanost
je imperativ na osnovu koga laboratorije imaju formalni
Imaju}i u vidu sve ~injenice vezane za problematiku o kojoj je re~ moe da se zaklju~i da }e dobra laboratorijska praksa, uz primenu kompletnog programa za obezbe|enje kvaliteta u bliskoj budu}nosti postati neophodni za sve laboratorije koje su zainteresovane za dobijanje nacionalnih i me|unarodnih certifikata
Summary
Vet. glasnik 59 (1 - 2) 71 - 78 (2005) Ruica A{anin i sar: Validacija laboratorijskih dijagnosti~kih metoda u sistemu kvaliteta pouzdanost. Imaju}i u vidu iznete ~injenice moe da se zaklju~i da }e dobra laboratorijska praksa, kao i implementacija potpunog programa za obezbe|enje kvaliteta u bliskoj budu}nosti postati neophodne za sve laboratorije koje su zainteresovane za dobijanje nacionalnih i me|unarodnih certifikata. Validacija laboratorijskih metoda / Validation of laboratory methods
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.