Laboratory and in-situ mechanical characterisation of masonry components by comparing destructive and minor destructive testing techniques

Abstract

The safeguard of existing masonry buildings requires a meticulous characterisation of the component materials (units and mortar) by using in-situ minimally intrusive techniques. This need is especially prominent in the case of heritage buildings in order to minimize their damage and alteration. This paper presents a research on some minor destructive techniques (MDT) for the in-situ evaluation of the mechanical properties of masonry components. In the research, the results derived from MDT were empirically correlated with the compressive strength obtained by using well-known destructive testing (DT) techniques executed in the laboratory. The experimental campaign focused on two different MDT techniques, namely the Pin Penetration Test (PPT) and the Helix screw Pull-out Test (HPT). The PPT is based on the measurement of the depth of penetration of a steel pin. The HPT is based on the measurement of the pull-out load necessary to extract a steel tie inserted into a hole drilled in a brick or in a mortar joint. The experimental campaign also included an evaluation of the Double Punch Test (DPT) by comparison with strength values obtained from mortar specimens prepared and tested following the standard EN 1015–11. The experimental results show a satisfactory agreement between the MDT measurements and the compressive strength obtained with DT. Although both the PPT and HPT are useful for the evaluation of the compressive strength of masonry components, the former exhibits a lower scattering in the experimental measurements.