Laboratory and greenhouse evaluation of a synthetic host volatile attractant for Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say)

Abstract

Abstract 1 The attractiveness of potato plants treated with a synthetic host volatile blend [(Z)‐3‐hexenyl acetate (+/–)‐linalool, and methyl salicylate] to newly emerged and 5‐day‐old adult Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say), was compared at four doses against untreated control plants and plants treated with an azadirachtin‐based antifeedant in greenhouse cage arenas.2 Attractant‐treated plants (derived release rates of 0, 5.7, 17.1 or 57 µg/h) were significantly more attractive than untreated control plants to newly emerged and 5‐day‐old adults only at 57 µg/h.3 Attractant‐treated plants were significantly more attractive than antifeedant‐treated plants to newly emerged and 5‐day‐old adults at the 5.7 µg/h treatment level and higher. Mean insect density on attractant‐treated plants in the attractant/antifeedant study was significantly higher than in the attractant/control study.4 Habituation to the synthetic attractant was evaluated by exposing adult beetles to the synthetic attractant for 0, 1, 2.5, 4, 8, 12 or 16 h, before release into a wind tunnel in which an attractant‐baited plant model was placed at the upwind end. Insects exposed to the synthetic host attractant for ≤ 8 h moved to the synthetic attractant‐baited plant model whereas insects exposed to the synthetic host attractant for 12 and 16 h did not. Furthermore, beetles exposed to the synthetic attractant for 0 and 1 h moved at rates greater than, or equal to, the median whereas beetles exposed for longer time periods moved at rates significantly less than the median.5 These results demonstrate the potential for using the synthetic plant attractant and an antifeedant as components in a stimulo‐deterrent strategy for management of the Colorado potato beetle as shown by us in another study.