Laboratory and Field Experimental Validation of Two Different Predation Sensors for Instrumenting Acoustic Transmitters in Fisheries Research

Abstract

We validated the performance of two types of predation sensors on acoustic telemetry transmitters in a combined field and laboratory study design using juvenile Atlantic Salmon Salmo salar and a predator large Brown Trout Salmo trutta. One tag model was outfitted with an acid‐sensitive predation sensor, and the other was equipped with a tilt‐based orientation sensor. We found similar response times for the two tag types to identify a predation event (time between known ingestion of a tagged fish and triggering of the predation sensor). However, the orientation sensor model was more accurate in laboratory trials, correctly identifying 100% of events in which predators were fed the tagged fish, whereas correct identification of predation events was 50% for the acid‐sensitive sensor in similar trials. The acid‐sensitive tags were smaller (0.65 g in air), and all 10 were eventually expelled by predators in the laboratory (2–22 d after tag ingestion). By contrast, only two of five tags with orientation sensors (1.4 g in air) were expelled in a similar period (13 and 16 d after tag ingestion). Both tags had distinct benefits: acid‐sensitive sensor tags were very small, and orientation sensor tags were seemingly more accurate and transmitted raw orientation data to receivers for postprocessing.