Abstract

Over the past few decades, labor market deregulation has dominated the policymaking agenda. These practices entailed, among others, easing the regulatory framework for employment protection, weakening collective bargaining institutions and promoting non-standard forms of employment as a means to achieve the desired degree of flexibility. Meanwhile, conventional analyses failed to investigate the correlation between deregulation and in-work poverty. In fact, poverty was examined exclusively as a consequence of unemployment, thus obscuring its multidimensional nature. This policy brief aims to present the core arguments for and against deregulation, as well as to provide a literature review on the relation between deregulation and in-work poverty. Finally, some remarks are made on the urgent need for change in the orientation of policymaking in a post-covid era.

Highlights

  • The promotion of labor market deregulation is one of the greatest fields of conflict in economics and social sciences

  • Typical examples of that are the Thatcher and Reagan administrations in UK and USA respectively, through a direct attack on the labor market institutions (Tourtouri et al, 2018). These proposals are not limited to western economies

  • International organizations such as the World Bank, which is actively engaged in establishing development programs for developing economies, fully aligns with the deregulation agenda

Read more

Summary

HAPSc Policy Briefs Series

Labor Market Deregulation & In-Work Poverty: Considerations on the Future of Social Policy

Introduction
Findings
The rationale for deregulation
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call