Abstract
I analyze the relationship between labor intensity -- the wages to revenue ratio -- and a firm's risk and book-to-market ratio in a production model. Under plausible parameters, labor intensive firms are riskier and exhibit higher book-to-market ratios than capital intensive firms. Covariance with the stochastic discount factor grows with labor intensity so the return spread between labor and capital intensive firms should explain the cross-section of stock returns. I provide evidence that labor intensive firms do appear riskier than capital intensive firms and that the spread between labor and capital intensive firms helps explain the cross-section of stock returns.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.