Abstract

Discussion begins with a review of three major concerns of the labelling perspective in deviance: (1) locating the social origins of stigmatic labels; (2) documenting the application of these labels to selected populations; and (3) assessing the consequences of the labelling process for the recipients' future conduct. It is suggested that the latter concern is the most dramatic aspect of the labelling perspective. Two assumptions accompanying this version of the labelling argument are reviewed: (1) other's reaction to subject intensifies subject's behavior; and (2) psychological differences do not exist in a manner relevant to the production and explanation of deviant behavior. After accumulating evidence suggestive of weaknesses in the preceding assumptions, it is argued that the popularity of the labelling perspective in deviance may be best understood as an instance in the “Sociology of the Interesting.” Implications are suggested.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.