Abstract

We compare herein the interfacial reactivity of self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) of 11-mercaptoundecanoic acid (MUA), 1-undecanethiol (UDT) and 11-mercaptoundecanol (MUD) on gold surfaces towards aqueous solutions of poly-( l-lysine) (PL). Liquid-phase labelling of PL with the alkyne dicobalt hexacarbonyl cluster 1 combined with analysis of the substrates by Fourier transform infrared reflection–absorption spectroscopy (FT-IRRAS) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) revealed that irreversible binding of PL occurred in all cases. However, the mechanism of binding involved differed markedly from one monolayer to the other. The main mode of interaction of PL to MUA SAM was of electrostatic nature between the terminal carboxylate of MUA and the ammonium groups of PL. For a similar number of bound thiolate molecules, the UDT adsorbed layer was found less continuous than the MUA one, allowing a higher fraction of PL to directly bind to the gold surface. As for MUD, very little thiolate molecules were adsorbed, leaving bare gold surface areas for non specific adsorption of PL.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call