Abstract

In experimental physics, lab notebooks play an essential role in the research process. For all of the ubiquity of lab notebooks, little formal attention has been paid to addressing what is considered “best practice” for scientific documentation and how researchers come to learn these practices in experimental physics. Using interviews with practicing researchers, namely, physics graduate students, we explore the different experiences researchers had in learning how to effectively use a notebook for scientific documentation. We find that very few of those interviewed thought that their undergraduate lab classes successfully taught them the benefit of maintaining a lab notebook. Most described training in lab notebook use as either ineffective or outright missing from their undergraduate lab course experience. Furthermore, a large majority of those interviewed explained that they did not receive any formal training in maintaining a lab notebook during their graduate school experience and received little to no feedback from their advisors on these records. Many of the interviewees describe learning the purpose of, and how to maintain, these kinds of lab records only after having a period of trial and error, having already started doing research in their graduate program. Despite the central role of scientific documentation in the research enterprise, these physics graduate students did not gain skills in documentation through formal instruction, but rather through informal hands-on practice.Received 1 April 2016DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020129Published by the American Physical SocietyPhysics Subject Headings (PhySH)Research AreasLearning environmentProfessional TopicsGraduate studentsPhysics Education Research

Highlights

  • Scientific communication is commonly defined as the communication of scientific results to the community, typically through scientific presentations and publications in scientific journals

  • The need for research in this area has been expressed in a recent report by the American Association of Physics Teachers (AAPT) [3], as well as by the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology [4], and an earlier report by the National Science Foundation (NSF) [5]

  • Through interviews of experimental physics graduate students, we explored how these researchers developed a key scientific skill—scientific documentation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Scientific communication is commonly defined as the communication of scientific results to the community, typically through scientific presentations and publications in scientific journals. The need for research in this area has been expressed in a recent report by the American Association of Physics Teachers (AAPT) [3], as well as by the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology [4], and an earlier report by the National Science Foundation (NSF) [5].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call