Abstract

Abstract : The eighteenth and nineteenth century descriptions of high mountain landscapes are rich in metaphors and analogies with the world of architecture. What is the reason for such numerous and regular analogies ? What role do they play ? Even though their ornamental value cannot be excluded, it remains secondary. Are such analogies intended to familiarise readers with an unknown yet not too disconcerting reality, to lessen the shock of something which is new ? Did travellers during the periods of Enlightenment and romanticism, most of whom were urban dwellers, project onto this sublime and yet inhospitable environment the imaginary elements of an urban landscape which at that time was developing rapidly and becoming accepted in French literature ?

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.