Abstract

The demonstrated role of the tight control of hyperglycaemia for the prevention of long-term diabetic complications has reoriented the goals of insulin supply toward the search for restoration of the effects of physiological insulin secretion rather than the simple survival of insulin deficient patients and the reduction in the number of daily insulin injections to be performed. Normal blood glucose control requires the availability of a fast-acting insulin therapy at meal time in order to reduce hyperglycaemic excursions and a basal insulin therapy able to stabilize blood glucose between meals. Reduction of induced hypoglycaemic risk represents the secondary objective beside the main goal of avoiding hyperglycaemia. Fast-acting analogues, by a faster dissociation of their hexameric conformation after their injection or infusion in subcutaneous tissue, reduce post-meal hyperglycaemia, while their shortened duration of action versus regular insulin minimizes late post-absorptive risk of hypoglycaemia. Long-acting analogues, by their precipitation in subcutaneous tissue or their slowly reversible binding to albumin, provide a benefit on blood glucose stability versus NPH or zinc insulins. Continuous insulin therapy using pumps offers both a better blood glucose stability than multiple daily injections and a broader flexibility in life mode. Using the peritoneal route by implantable pumps is a mean to improve blood glucose stability in poorly controlled patients in spite of optimized subcutaneous insulin therapy. The development of glucose sensors provides reinforced information on blood glucose, versus self-monitoring by capillary blood measurements, that contributes to a better adaptation of insulin therapy. First trials of connections between blood glucose data and insulin delivery open a perspective toward glucose-modulated insulin therapy, at least in periods outside meals, leading to first models of semi-automated artificial endocrine pancreas. The alternative of a cellular insulin supply by pancreas or islet transplantation looked promising during recent years, but lack of transplants and adverse events related to immune suppression limit their use to very specific cases where benefit/risk ratio is positive.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.