Abstract
This article reviews John H. Goldthorpe’s latest essay Sociology as a Population Science (2016). After outlining the main theses of the book, two major issues arising from the British sociologist’s proposal are discussed: the concept of causality and the boundaries of sociology. On the former, it is argued that Goldthorpe’s critique of the counterfactual approach in sociology is not convincing, particularly as concerns the issue of voluntarism in human social action. On the issue of the boundaries, it is maintained that Goldthorpe’s definition of sociology as a population science regards more its method rather than its substantive content. This leaves unanswered the question of how sociology can be distinguished from neighboring disciplines such as demography and economics, and what would be the mutual benefits from an alliance with them.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
