Abstract

Aim The aim of our study was to make evident the huge variability in lymph node dissection practice. Material and methods Therefore a retrospective study was conducted on 330 patients assessed for cervical, axillary or groin dissections. In each case the authors collected the primary diagnosis and clinical stage indicating lymph node clearance, identity of the surgeon and the pathologist, surgical technique including skin incision and landmarks of tissue removal, size of the clearance, and number of lymph nodes removed. Correlations between diagnosis, surgeon's or pathologist's identity, size of the clearance and number of nodes were analyzed using non-parametric tests. Results Standardized procedures as axillary dissections occurred few differences between surgeons. In groin or cervical dissections statistical differences were made evident with great technical variability. There was a positive correlation between size of the piece of lymphadenectomy and number of lymph nodes removed. Conclusion Standardized procedures as axillary dissections provide few variations. Cervical and especially groin dissections should be harmonized, published and taught harmoniously in schools of surgery. So the expression “regional lymph node clearance” would mean.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.