Abstract
H. van Gunsteren's definition of citizenship as a publicoffice that consists of dealing with plurality, is analysed into two different perspectives: a communautarian axis (the ffirmation that the principle and the end of politics is plurality) and a republican axis (the idea that, as Hannah Arendt has already argued, the public domain as to be based upon itself though symbolically determined institutions). The A. criticises his restriction of the political public domain to the classical State-centered problematics, as opposed to a local, continuous, micropolitical attempt to procede any given differences into reflected ones through the required republican institutions, which was the original content of his own neorepublican citizenship
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
