Abstract
These notes tackle the continuity of the Government after its dissolution as well as the consequences brought about in its scope of action. The analysis focuses in the doctrine of the Supreme Court and, more specifically, in the three sentences that have to date studied whether certain decisions of the outgoing Government (namely, the rejection of pardon, the granting of an extradition and the approval of a decree concerning doping) could be framed into the ordinary management of public affairs. With this rather indeterminate juridical concept the Government Law limited the competences of the outgoing Government. Likewise, some of the most controversial issues faced by the interim Government from December 2015 up to October 2016 are analysed.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
